Packaging is somewhat of a black art on OS X. The Flat Package format has been in existence since 10.5, but only recently are more 3rd-party packaging tools like JAMF Composer starting to move to this format by default. PackageMaker's days as a hidden download in the Apple Developer Center Auxiliary Downloads package are numbered. In this post I'll look at one aspect of the package system that's perhaps less widely known, the "ownership" of a file to a package, and how this affects behaviour that can be tweaked when building flat packages, using pkgbuild as the reference package-building tool.
By default, when an OS X package is installed, if it is an upgrade of a previous version (in other words, there is a package with the same package identifier of a lower version number already installed), any files in its payload that were present in the previous version and not in the new version will be removed from the filesystem. This is because these files are associated with that version of a package in the package (ie. "receipts") database. When a new version of the package is installed, the Installer framework helpfully removes these files that are no longer part of the package's payload. In other words, if you install file
/usr/local/bin/my_script in version 1, and instead only
/usr/local/bin/my_new_script in version 2,
my_script will be deleted if it was present when version 2 was installed, assuming that this package identifier is still known to the package database. (It wouldn't be if, for example,
pkgutil --forget my.package.identifier was ever run manually or by an installer script).
We can use the built-in pkgutil tool to query the package database for metadata about packages (BOMs, identifiers, versions, etc.). To examine what package installed pkgbuild, for example, on this OS X 10.8.2 system:
➜ ~ pkgutil --file-info /usr/bin/pkgbuild volume: / path: /usr/bin/pkgbuild pkgid: com.apple.pkg.BSD pkg-version: 10.8.0.1.1.1306847324 install-time: 1351028588 uid: 0 gid: 0 mode: 755
com.apple.pkg.BSD is part of a standard OS X install.
One curious PackageInfo element documented by Stéphane Sudre is the
dont-obsolete element. As its name might suggest, "obsoleting" seems to be responsible for removing these files that are no longer present in upgraded package versions.
A real-world example: We recently had an internal support package included in our thin deployment image, one of whose payload items contained a template configuration file that was modified later as part of our DeployStudio workflow. I updated this support package with newer versions of unrelated components to be imported into Munki to push out to clients automatically, wanted to not overwrite this file when Munki would automatically install the package, and at the same time not remove the old one. The
dont-obsolete element turns out to be one solution to solve this problem within the logic of the package payload itself, without requiring workarounds in postinstall scripts that could potentially cause issues and greater complexity in the long term.
We can use the undocumented (but documented here by Greg Neagle)
--info option for pkgbuild to supply the
dont-obsolete element to be included in the final built
PackageInfo file, using a template
PackageInfo that looks like this:
<pkg-info> <dont-obsolete> <file path="/usr/local/bin/my_script"/> </dont-obsolete> </pkg-info>
And to build the package:
pkgbuild --identifier my.package.identifier \ --version 2.0 \ --root /my/payload/root \ --info /my/template/pkginfo-file \ my_support_package-2.0.pkg
Assuming the package we're upgrading uses the same identifier and is a lower version number, this should do what we want, which is to persist the file at
/usr/local/bin/my_script after the installation, even if it's not included in the 2.0 version of our package.
Instead of using the
--info option, we could also build the package without it, then later use pkgutil with the
--expand option, edit the PackageInfo file manually and finally
--flatten it as I documented in this earlier post on iOS Simulators. This is of course much more work, but is easily automated.
pkgbuild also includes a useful
--prior [pkg-path] option, which will automatically derive the identifier, version and install-location parameters from a package located at
pkg-path. According to the pkgbuild manpage, however, this will convert the version number to an integer and increment it, which may not be what you want.
Also, there are some exceptions to when files are actually "obsoleted". For example, removing old files will not necessarily occur if the
PackageInfo file has
bundle-version elements defined, which would happen if one is packaging, for example, an application bundle. Using pkgbuild with the
--root option will perform some analysis on the contents to extract bundle versions and place these in the
PackageInfo file. Look into the
--component-plist plist options in the pkgbuild manpage to customize these further. Managing bundle metadata with the pkgbuild and productbuild tools is quite a bit more advanced, so the example in this post is mainly useful for application/site-specific data in simple files.